Bauer Slashes Rate Bases … And Uses Old Cover Photos
Plus: How the other celeb rags are faring
 

lifestyleshiloh.jpg

After newsstand owners pressured Bauer to raise the cover prices of In Touch and Life & Style – which, based on the terms these checkout aisle pocket owners have with publishers, means they'll see a larger share of each sale – the tabloids faced backlash from readers in the form of fewer sales. Which means Richard Spencer's two tabloids are forced to cut their rate bases.

In Touch, though its total circ was 1,271,354 in the second half of 2007, hit its 1.2 million rate base, but is lowering its number guaranteed to advertisers to 1 million, down 17 percent.

Life & Style, which had circ of 681,723, missed its 700,000 rate base. It, too, is lowering its guarantee, down to 550,000, or 21 percent.

To be fair, the celeb weekly category, overall, has been slipping, thanks to heavy saturation and those damn gossip blogs. And Bauer has repeatedly inched up the rate bases of both tabloids since they launched; in many instances, In Touch beat veteran heavyweight competitors at the newsstand.

Us Weekly's circ, meanwhile, is up 2.7 percent to 1,005,081; total paid circ is up 10 percent to 1,928,852. OK! is up 24 percent, to 935,378. People will report a fall of 3.5 percent, to 3.7 million, while newsstand dropped 6 percent to 1.42 million. Star is expected to show a 3 or 4 percent dip in newsstand sales, to 713,000.

Meanwhile, even with the rate base cut, Bauer insists its now making more money, with the cover price hikes, than before. So they shouldn't be able to blame budget cuts, then, when explaining why this week's cover of Life & Style (above right) features Bragenlina's baby Shiloh in a blue sweater … that's actually an old photo of her, which appeared on Life & Style last month (above left), but flipped and color-swapped.

Fark Facebook Digg StumbleUpon Del.icio.us Reddit
Comments (2)

No. 1 · Shakira

I no longer buy lifeandstyle or intouch because of the dollar price increase. The only reason i was a patron was because of the low cost. I guess I will stick to the Gossip Blogs for now!!! But i am highly disappointed by the price increase.

Posted: Feb 10, 2008 at 3:17 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 2 · Dina

Images are reused on rag covers all the time-especially for famous babies, as there's not that many shots of them to begin with. I regularly see the same few shots of celebrities make the rounds. Never in the same week, on competing mags, but there's definitely repetition.

Posted: Feb 11, 2008 at 3:48 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
Leave a Comment

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

Already have an account? Then log in!

NEW: You can add images to your comment by clicking here and entering the URL of the picture.

 
Scroll Posts
Blawgstars « Next Prev »
Jossip Home | Advertise | Copyright 2009 Jossip Initiatives