The New York Times Opens Their Belly Button Up For Viewing
things get less meta
 

john-mc.jpg

Sick of all the analysis of the New York Times article on John McCain yesterday? Sick of the analysis of that analysis? Hey, maybe we're projecting.

Either way, the New York Times will answer your questions directly today:

A recent New York Times article examined a number of decisions by Senator John McCain that raised questions about his judgment over potential conflicts of interest. The article included reporting on Mr. McCain’s relationship with a female lobbyist whose clients often had business before the Senate committee led by Mr. McCain. Since publication of the article, The Times has received over 2,000 comments, many of them criticizing the handling of the article. Editors and reporters who worked on the article will be answering questions on Friday. Please send yours to askthetimes@nytimes.com.

And if you want to look at our belly button, we'll be analyzing their answers later on.

Feb 22, 2008 · 0 views (beta) · Link · 1 Response
Tagged: ,
Fark Facebook Digg StumbleUpon Del.icio.us Reddit
Comments (1)

No. 1 · hms

The McCain "piece" maybe be the straw that broke the NYT's back. The National Enquirer would have done better research and had more reliable sources. What the Times did was despicable and I'm not a McCain person. I hope McCain sues for slander and wins.
I'd put them in the same category as Perez Hilton.

Posted: Feb 22, 2008 at 9:58 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
Leave a Comment

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

Already have an account? Then log in!

NEW: You can add images to your comment by clicking here and entering the URL of the picture.

 
Scroll Posts
« Next — Prev » It’s A Girl! It’s A Boy! It’s Six Million Dollars!
Jossip Home | Advertise | Copyright 2009 Jossip Initiatives