One Network that Isn't Afraid to Spend Like 1989
Living it up
 


Whoa whoa whoa! There is a network out there that isn't sending out pink slips and canceling their holiday party? Shit, are they hiring?

CNN has seen double-digit profits for the last five years in a row, sort of a freakish oversight by the big guy upstairs which has allowed the station to use the extra cash flow to hold crazy CNN Grill parties like the one on election night, and employ cutting edge (but ultimately faked) technology for it's Nov. 4th holograms.

But no one wants to know how the station is going to spend their money. They want to know why the Time Warner station is doing so well in the first place.

And whereas, say, MSNBC is tied to the sinking fortunes of a broadcast news division, CNN is free to reinvest its bounty back into its news coverage and into … well … whatever else seems appealing. Recent splurges have included building a new international hub in Abu Dhabi; planning a wire service that could eventually compete with the Associated Press; and kicking off a weekend comedy-news show hosted by comedian D. L. Hughley. [Update, November 19, 11:33 a.m.: CNN's wire service is still in development.]

Ah, so because CNN doesn't have a broadcast station like, say, Fox or NBC, they can make a neat little turnaround without having to prop up any of their sister channels. Which is good news, because as well as FNC and MSNBC do in the ratings, all the money Roger Ailes or Phil Griffin make have to be lumped in with a larger sum of checks and deficits.

Meanwhile CNN Worldwide prez Jim Walton is free to use the extra scratch to funnel right back into his company, the ratings be damned. Not like the viewership is sagging: if anything CNN consistently places high in the news cycle, and won election night coverage by a landslide. No doubt in part to all the glitz and glamor of a faked teleportation device.

Fark Facebook Digg StumbleUpon Del.icio.us Reddit
Comments (1)

No. 1 · Theycookedthebooks

http://www.business-standard.c.....ono=340271

Time Warner books are full of bias

ROUND THE WORLD
Jonathan Weil / Bloomberg November 16, 2008, 0:12 IST

At Cable News Network, the motto for Anderson Cooper’s show is “Keeping Them Honest.’’ Campbell Brown’s credo is “No Bias. No Bull.’’ Here’s a story for them: Time Warner Inc’s biased BS — balance sheet, that is.
The company that used to broadcast the Goodwill Games is playing fast and loose again with a different kind of goodwill.
At $8.61 a share, Time Warner has a stock-market value of $30.9 billion. Yet according to the balance sheet Time Warner released last week, just one of its assets, goodwill, by itself was worth $42.5 billion as of Sept 30. The company, which owns CNN, also showed $52.1 billion of other intangible assets, mostly cable-television franchise rights.
The market knows those asset values can’t be right. Time Warner executives just won’t admit it. Meanwhile, Time Warner said its net income last quarter was $1.1 billion, down slightly from a year earlier. The stock, down 48 percent this year, now trades for about half the company’s official book value, or assets minus liabilities.
The pretend asset values should concern all Americans, not just Time Warner stakeholders. That’s because Time Warner’s chairman, Richard Parsons, has Barack Obama’s ear as a member of the president-elect’s Transition Economic Advisory Board.
It’s a safe bet that Parsons, who also is a member of Citigroup Inc.’s board, won’t be pushing Obama to champion straight talk in financial reporting. While slogans about truth-telling might help CNN’s ratings, implementing those values at headquarters would hurt Time Warner’s profits.
HERE AGAIN
Time Warner has travelled this path before. In 2002, it wrote off about $100 billion of goodwill and other intangibles after disastrous results from its acquisition by America Online Inc sent the company’s shares crashing. Back then, too, the company was slow to acknowledge the decline in its asset values. A Time Warner spokesman, Keith Cocozza, declined to comment.
Goodwill can’t be sold off to pay the bills. As I’ve said in several columns this year warning about bloated goodwill at CBS Corp, Wachovia Corp, Washington Mutual Inc, Lee Enterprises Inc and others, it’s just the ledger entry one company records when it pays a premium for another company.
Specifically, goodwill is the amount by which the purchase price exceeds the fair value of the acquired company’s net assets. When the value of the purchased assets crashes, so does the value of the corresponding goodwill.
In its quarterly financial report to regulators last week, Time Warner said it will test its goodwill and other intangibles for impairment at the end of the fourth quarter. The company said it saw no need to perform such tests last quarter, although it cautioned that writedowns this quarter “could be material.’’
AWAITING MIRACLES
Barring miraculous turnarounds in the economy and the fortunes of old-school media properties, such as magazines and cable networks, my back-of-the-envelope math tells me Time Warner’s goodwill is worthless.
Other legacy-media companies have started the writedown process already. CBS wrote off $14.1 billion of goodwill and other intangibles last quarter. Even after those markdowns, it still claimed to have $15.9 billion of the stuff. By comparison, CBS’s market value is $4.1 billion.
As of November 12, there were 165 US companies worth less than their goodwill that also traded at a discount to book value, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Combined, these companies had $364.8 billion of goodwill on their books. That was $137.6 billion, or 61 percent, more than their market values. (The figures exclude companies with market capitalizations of $100 million or less.)
Some of those are media companies, including newspaper publisher Gannett Co. Most are not, such as defense contractor Northrop Grumman Corp, drugmaker Boston Scientific Corp, retailer Macy’s Inc, and supermarket chain Supervalu Inc.
All this is further confirmation that the worst of the economic crisis lies ahead. Before we get it behind us, people like Richard Parsons will have to start facing reality about the value of the businesses they run. Further delay only makes matters worse. It’s bloodletting time.

Posted: Nov 24, 2008 at 4:08 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
Leave a Comment

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

Already have an account? Then log in!

NEW: You can add images to your comment by clicking here and entering the URL of the picture.

 
Scroll Posts
Jossip Home | Advertise | Copyright 2009 Jossip Initiatives