Nielsen's Very Curious 'Revision' That Claims NBC's Super Bowl Was Actually The Most-Watched Ever
 

NFL/SUPER

BULLSHIT DETECTOR — NBC shells out $650 million a year to the NFL, part of which went toward securing broadcast rights for last weekend's Super Bowl. It charged advertisers upwards of $3 million for each of the sixty-nine 30-second spots, a new high, to bring in $206 million in ad revenue, also a new high. How disappointing for the peacock network then, when Nielsen said that while Pittsburgh's defeat of Arizona drew huge audiences — 147 million total, and 95.4 million average tuning in — it wasn't the most watched Super Bowl ever. Nevermind that, however, because anything can be fixed with a little politicking. Nielsen has "revised" its statement, and officially crowned NBC's broadcast of Super Bowl XLIII as, yes, the most watched ever. How'd that happen?

NFL/SUPER

It was only Monday when Nielsen Media Research said XLIII was the second-most-watched Super Bowl (and third most-watched program ever). But wait! All of that changed in the last 48 hours!

Now, in a revised statement, Nielsen says Super Bowl XLIII was the most-watched Super Bowl and most-watched TV program in history, with 151.6 million total viewers and 98.7 million average viewers.

Why the discrepancy? Because Nielsen, as it's wont to do, realized its audience measurement methodology is about as reliable as Bernie Madoff's accounting methodology: "Nielsen explained the discrepancy of more than 3 million viewers by saying a more complete check of their records revealed additional viewership on some digital tier networks. The company hadn't been aware that they were showing the game."

They weren't aware that digital tiers networks were, uh, "showing the game"? On NBC? A major broadcast network that every single TV tier carries?

Bullshit, Nielsen. But hey, congrats to NBC Sports president Dick Ebersol for what can only be assumed to be a round of convincing late-night phone calls to get Nielsen to suddenly "find" this other information to boost ratings numbers — and give Ebersol and Jeff Zucker another notch on their belt.

Fark Facebook Digg StumbleUpon Del.icio.us Reddit
Comments (4)

No. 1 · ratingsexec

Its up to the nets to provide Nielsen the correct program lineups. Nielsen has nothing to gain or lose by revising program audeince estimates. If placating the networks complaints by re-issuing the data were SOP for Nielsen the numbers would never see the light of day.

Posted: Feb 4, 2009 at 2:14 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 2 · kinky-neo-con

LMAO…
check it out y'all!; GE Universal/NBC/MSNBC=Obama-TV/CNBC has become the 'National Propaganda' Network! (they luv Obama/'da messiah') so they can say-do whatever theys want!

Posted: Feb 4, 2009 at 2:50 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 3 · James

Just ask the guy from Mediaweek.com about the accuracy of fast nationals of live events and updated (and more accurate) ratings. They get changed all the time and it doesn't mean there is a conspiracy really, just that the process of the Nielsen ratings suck overall and probably will never be truly accurate.

Posted: Feb 4, 2009 at 3:44 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 4 · footballfanatic

Yea…it's a simple task to turn around the ratings for the biggest annual television event in 12 hours…how dare Nielsen give themselves a chance to properly report the numbers after a thorough review!

Posted: Feb 5, 2009 at 10:14 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
Leave a Comment

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

Already have an account? Then log in!

NEW: You can add images to your comment by clicking here and entering the URL of the picture.

 
Scroll Posts
Jossip Home | Advertise | Copyright 2009 Jossip Initiatives