Let's take a look at this: Bill O'Reilly is applauding New York Time's TV critic Alessandra Stanley, a woman not known for her ability to fact check, for her comments about Fox News and MSNBC. Even though it's doubtful she even watches television, since she got wrong the fact that it's CNN that calls their anchors "the best political team on television," not MSNBC. (And somewhere out there, there's a built-in counter for how many days it's been since Stanley got the dates of the Iraq War wrong.)

But Stanley is spelled L-E-Y, not, as it's written on the Factor, E-L-Y. So is this thumbs up actually a subtle smirk at the error-riddled NYT? Or just more proof that even those who would call themselves infallible are, in fact, human after all. Or at least their writers are.