That The Smoking Gun did its job

sabatino.jpg Here’s the Los Angeles Times‘ apology to Sean Combs for fingering him as involved in a 1994 assault on Tupac Shakur — an allegation made based on fake FBI documents journalist Chuck Philips received from con man James Sabatino. “In relying on documents that I now believe were fake, I failed to do my job,” said Philips in a statement. Interestingly, Philips is “an acquaintance” of Smoking Gun editor Bill Bastone, who helped expose the fraud. Says the LAT: “The two met not long ago for lunch, discussing their mutual passion for investigative reporting and other matters.” The apology appeared on today’s front page, below the fold.

Mar 27, 2008 · Link · 1 Response
Reporter gets punk'd by serial con man

tupac.jpgdiddy.jpg

Looks like the Los Angeles Times got hosed when Pulitzer winner (though not-always-trusted journalist) Chuck Philips accused Sean “Diddy” Combs of knowing about a 1994 attack on Tupac Shakur before it happened. Diddy, of course, denied the charge. As did the family of Chris Wallace/Notorious B.I.G. when Philips earlier accused the rapper of putting the hit on Tupac in ‘96.

And they had good reason: It’s likely none of it was true. The Times got its info from FBI documents that are now being labeled as fakes, concocted by jailed con man James Sabatino, who tried to fictitiously insert himself in the lives of hip-hop heads.

Diligent reporting from The Smoking Gun reveals the docs aren’t in any FBI database and that Sabtatino – “an audacious swindler who has created a fantasy world in which he managed hip-hop luminaries, conducted business with Combs, Shakur, Busta Rhymes, and The Notorious B.I.G., and even served as Combs’s trusted emissary to Death Row Records boss Marion ‘Suge’ Knight” – was able to distribute them himself by conveniently redacting the names of the federal agents working on the case. Too bad there are other ways to search for the files in the FBI’s records and, low and behold, they don’t turn up.

sabatino.jpg

And also, just like the documents involved in the fall of Dan Rather, their physical elements are a giveaway. Cue an internal investigation at the LAT! And, maybe, a major libel suit from Diddy!

CONTINUED »

Mar 26, 2008 · Link · 1 Response