Dan Cooper Knew Why Fox News Would Succeed
It's just that nobody wanted to hear it!

fnclogo.jpg dancooper.jpg

Former Roger Ailes charge and current foe Dan Cooper returns – with what we imagine will be an on-going book teaser promotional playto explain why, when Fox News was charging up in the late 90s, neither CNN or MSNBC made any major move to squash the newcomer.

When Ailes positioned FNC as "Fair & Balanced," marketing strategist Jack Trout told Cooper in 2003, "he re-positioned CNN and MSNBC as biased." Hilarious, we know.

But, as Cooper says: "The day 'Fair and Balanced' was first used was D-Day in the war to destroy the competitors. [...] The result: incomprehensible programming chaos at CNN and MSNBC over a period of years. Double-digit ratings declines. Inability to understand what Ailes is doing. Inability to develop, or even understand the need to develop, a counter-strategy. Just more talent and programming mistakes."

Psychological warfare! They might as well have waterboarded the enemy.

As will be explained in a soon-to-be-published post on Cooper's blog, all the above appeared in a 2003 article for Insights, the trade pub distributed free to CEOs. Well, it would have appeared, except it was killed by the editorial board (which was stocked with executive types, not journos).

"The INSIGHTS editorial board member from PricewaterhouseCoopers [Peter Winkler] expressed some concern that your article was excessively critical of CNN and MSNBC — each of which is a significant client of PwC," Cooper received in a note. "In consideration for his concern, I suggested that he attempt to edit the article so as to temper what he felt was 'too harsh.'"

You can imagine what those edits looked like. Without the substance of the article remaining, Cooper refused to let them publish it. Which meant he got to retain all of his valuable insight into FNC's success! Consulting fees be damned.

Here's the snap: Ailes did not create a cable channel based on programming or personalities. He didn't begin by sitting in his office with his crew saying, "OK, we've got O'Reilly and Hannity in prime time, what are we going to do the rest of the day, and who's going to do it?" Nor did he do anything so simple as create a conservative news channel. After all, Fox News could have been branded as a conservative news channel. If the common wisdom were true, that would be enough to position Fox News in its niche and build its audience. But Ailes didn't do that. In truth, that wouldn't be enough to accomplish what Fox News has become.

Ailes created a cable news channel built on a marketing strategy, and a brilliant one, and a daring one. The programming, and the talent, and all the creative elements, were then created, hired and scheduled to serve that marketing strategy. Ailes positioned Fox News as being "Fair and Balanced". [...]

When MSNBC launched, with one huge scenic environment featuring brick walls, stylish doodads hanging from the ceiling and hi-tech anchor desks, Ailes took to referring to it as the "cappuccino bar" channel. Think about that. From a positioning point of view, he was mocking MSNBC for its then-innate yuppieness. He knew they were dead the minute they went on the air. At these meetings, Ailes would both describe what he wanted Fox News to look like on air, and he would talk theoretically about how he would differentiate the Fox product. It was all marketing strategy. There was no talk about programming. It was simply brilliant.

Jan 17, 2008 · posted by david · Link · 3 Responses
Related Posts

  • No related posts found.
  • Comments (3)

    No. 1 Kay Shostak says:

    And Ailes struck a cord with the vast numbers of folks out in tv news viewing land when he put up the words "Fair and Balanced". We knew the news programs weren't fair and balanced, we just didn't know anyone in charge realized it. He didn't create his market - he filled a need.

    Posted: Jan 19, 2008 at 1:28 pm
    No. 2 Nick Vincent says:

    One thing you ought to note is that those pompous dolts over at NBC have become their own worst enemies in this regard, because they continually demonstrate that they are neither fair nor balanced. You had that big-mouth at CNBC snickering away as she called President Bush a "monkey"; you have Chris Matthews being forced to apologize to Hillary for a stupid comment; you now have video circulating of the MSNBC producers audibly laughing and making snide comments in the background as Matthews and Olbermann make snarky remarks about Fred Thompson. The NBC product continues to cement itself as a third-rate operation because of things like this. No wonder they're in the ratings toilet.

    Posted: Jan 20, 2008 at 11:21 pm
    No. 3 Jonathan Kahnoski says:

    "When Ailes positioned FNC as “Fair & Balanced,” … Hilarious, we know."

    You can have your snide little chuckles, and Ailes will keep eating your lunch.

    "Fair and Balanced" - when spoken as an absolute, no network, broadcast or cable, is truly "Fair and Balanced". Afterall, its human beings making the decisions.

    "Fair and Balanced" - when speaking relatively, can be claimed legitimately by FNC - as in FNC is more "fair and balanced" than [your favorite MSM outlet here]. Sorry, but Mr. Vincent's examples, plus the cheers that went up in the Seattle newspaper's newsroom when Karl Rove's resignation was announced, plus any number of other examples, shows clearly demonstrates the bias. Does anyone believe anything in the New York Times anymore? By comparison, FNC is a model of classical journalism.

    Posted: Jan 22, 2008 at 7:47 pm
    Leave a Comment

    It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

    Already have an account? Then log in!

    Scroll Posts
    The CP For 2008 « Next Prev »