Everyone's a'speculating that only three months after giving birth to her daughter, Jamie Lynn Spears is pregnant again. And so far it seems to good to be true: The Spears faithful rep (god that man must be tired) already squelched the rumors.

But as they say, a story is only as true as you make it (that's not something anyone says), so Bonnie Fuller and The Huffington Post are going to continue on this Lynn pregnancy lead, because it allows them to keep drawing comparisons to Bristol Palin:

While Jamie Lynn is telling her friends, according to The Enquirer, that she didn't think she could get pregnant while breastfeeding, I'm not buying that excuse. Wouldn't most girls in a similar predicament who truly didn't want a repeat pregnancy be religious about using contraception?

"I can't believe ignorance is at play", agrees Dr. Irwin. "I can't imagine her OB/GYN wouldn't have fully discussed contraception with her," so she wouldn't oops, do it again.

And what about Mama Lynne Spears? Surely, she would have found some time between promoting her new book, "Through The Storm," to have had a heart to heart with Jamie Lynn about birth control. My guess is she's already back on the blower to OK! magazine to sell Jamie Lynn's new story and upcoming photos of the baby for another $1 million.

Take that Bristol Palin — your mom can't do that for you right now.

Haha yes. It is totally conceivable that Jamie Lynn Spears got pregnant again to spite backwoods Bristol Palin from taking all the money attention away from her. But wouldn't Spears just be following not only in her sisters steps with a second pregnancy, but, if rumors are to be believed, Bristol Palin's as well?

Also, to Bonnie Fuller and Huffpost: just because The National Enquirer got it right once or twice, doesn't mean that everything they write is some big breakout story now. It's still 99% B.S.