For PETA, No Cause Is Too Small
In a pathetic attempt to stay relevant, PETA has written an open letter to Kevin Federline asking him to take of Britney Spears’s dogs.
For the sake of your children and the animals who are at risk while in Ms. Spear’s custody, we hope that you will do the right and best thing for all involved and purse a custody order for the animal so that your sons can continue to have the company of the animals they’ve grown to adore.
Did PETA miss the news that Federline’s children broke the leg of one of the animals they so adore? Besides, it would be cruel to take away Britney’s only source of unconditional love right now.
Scroll Posts
Editorial Director
I'm very offended that you think this is "pathetic". I think you're vile for suggesting that these animals be with her and not the children that are attached to them. That trail of catsick doesn't deserve unconditional or any other kind of love.
I think you're pathetic, Michael. Who the hell cares about Britney's dogs? What everyone should be concerned with are her KIDS. But not PETA. PETA thinks that animals are more important than people, which is why they are a horrible organization.
And you, Melissa. . .are a total idiot.
PETA stands for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Not People for the Ethical Treatment of Kids.
I don't think that PETA is a horrible organization, so Melissa, I believe your comment is completely unnecessary. But, I don't believe they should be concerned about taking away one woman's dog. Sure maybe she doesn't give it the sole attention it deserves from it's owners, but if you think about the amount of housekeepers and the people within her entourage that take care of that animal, it's clearly taken care of. That dog isn't feeling "sad" because britney doesn't pay attention to it.