
Though Jacques Steinberg ratchets it up a notch, speculation about Rachel Maddow getting her own MSNBC show is nothing new; there were rumors that she was in the running for the 6pm slot that Tucker Carlson was vacating, though David Gregory was named to the hour. (Maddow is said to have performed test runs.)
And despite Gregory's consistently low ratings for the hour (sometimes lower than even Carlson's), it looks like he's sticking around, since he's Phil Griffin's token in replacing Chris Matthews as the face of MSNBC, though Keith Olbermann has kinda already done that.
So where to squeeze Maddow in? Perhaps in the 6pm slot, actually, when Gregory moves to take over Matthews' Hardball hour. One rumormongerer inside MSNBC says Maddow is ripe to take over Dan Abrams' 9pm hour, where the revamped Verdict hasn't exactly sent ratings skyrocketing, since it'll be a low-key testing ground for her "moderately"
liberal views.
Though nothing seems immediate — the network does, for now, appear to have a stable line up — it's clear she's on the short list of permanent talking heads. Griffin even said so.
Very quickly, Maddow became MSNBC's work horse, guesting on others' shows whenever asked and filling in whenever necessary — even though she has her own daily 3-hour Air America show to attend to. Likely, she'd have to abandon that show to take a permanent MSNBC gig.
And then there's Maddow's little lesbian matter, as in, she is one! And except for accepted closet cases like Anderson Cooper and Shep Smith, Maddow would become the first out pundit on cable news. Big deal, indeed.
Pirates Come Back for Second Round of Whoop-Ass (21)
· weezy says: “Gays and blacks like Obama, that’s pretty much it. Military LOVES Rush, and... »
· Rhonda says: They don’t always respect command, ever heard of the F U salute, soldiers hated... »
· bam-a-lam says: @Rhonda: The military always respects the President, no matter who he/she is. The... »
Bald A-Hole Joe the “Plumber” Now Stealing from Ignorant Poor People (39)
· weezy says: “Obama said, well I’m going to tax your earnings and give it to losers who... »
· Rhonda says: Bam, No one picked “Joe the Plumber” he asked Obama a guestion, Obama blew... »
· bam-a-lam says: “Joe the Plumber” really is a pretty bad spokesman. He’s not a... »
Obama Puppy Now Fielding Your Questions (67)
· whitney says: I didn’t have enough patience to read all of the pages of comments. PETA is... »
The Bigoted, Illiterate Tea Party Goons Gallery (106)
· weezy says: i hope all of those people protesting make 250K and above and will not take any stimulus... »
Despite Glenn Beck’s Support, Texas Will Never Secede (38)
· weezy says: @bam-a-lam: #18 brilliant post!!! #26 getreal: i agree. i think we should all get... »
GretaWire Wire (14)
· Rhonda says: Obama continues on his America Sucks 09 apology tour. Chavez and Obama looked pretty... »
I'd rather dig my eyes out with an icepick than have to sit and watch this left wing nutjob every night for an hour.
"moderately" liberal views? please, she's as far off the left side of the map as you can be - and whether she is "out" or not is irrelevant - you'd have to be deaf, dumb AND blind not to see DYKE written across her forehead…..
Hey Paul, dig away you insecure bigot. Change the channel, duh. Fox is your kind of 'news' network.
Rachel is well-informed and delivers the sarcasm with a panache that even Olberman must envy. She seems to have both a rolodex of facts, and an intellectual command of the relevance of those facts, that far exceeds any other MSNBC pundit. Bring her on. What a asset she would be.
I so Maddow the other knigh and I loved her she so inteligent and fast and looking at the msnbc site today looking for her show I was surprise that she dont have one.Sorry msnbc you are passing a fantastic professional.Rogerio Trindade
Yeah,Paul is a jerk.Rachel is an intelligent woman and some men{like Joe Scarborough}find that threatening.Too bad!TV could use her talents.
Love her! Think she is witty, smart, and has a great delivery. Have been wondering where her show is! MSNBC would be crazy to pass her up! Been saying for a long time that Bill Maher needs to have her on his show! Who cares about her personal life????
To Paul-not only are you an idiot but you are also a homophobe! What does any ones sexual orientation have to do with their ability to be an intelligent, witty, attractive woman? Why are you even commenting? Like Barbara said, go back to Fox where you are comfortable with O'Reilly and his sort.
Rachel Maddow as an msnbc anchor …. hmmm-mmmmmm.
Let's see: she's smart and articulate. Graduated from Stanford. Rhodes Scholar. Ph.D. from Oxford.
She certainly holds her own with the big boys. And, you're worried about her sexual preference?
I think she's perfect for "If it's Sunday morning, it's Meet the Press."
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE GIVE RACHEL HER OWN SHOW. IF YOU'D STOP AIRING HARDBALL (TWICE), YOU'D BE MUCH BETTER USE OF AIRTIME!
P.S. ONLY REASON I WATCH MORNIN' JOE IS CAUSE THAT'S REALLY THE ONLY POLI-NEWS ON IN THE MORNING. THE WAY HE TALKED TO RACHEL ON HARDBALL (WAS IT? WHEN THEY APPEARED TOGETHER) WAS HORRIBLE; TREATS MEEKA (SP?) THE SAME WAY. HE'S EXTEMELY DISRESPECTFUL TO WOMEN!! SO COULD MAKE HER THE LEAD HOST ON MORNING JOE AND GET RID OF HIM. I'D MUCH MORE PREFER WAKING UP TO MORNING RACHEL!
Yes, - and please keep slapping make-up on this parental disapointment… without it, she looks like a 14 year old boy!
Rachel Maddow is wicked smart, articulate and thorough. she'd be a brilliant choice to host a show. She remains respectful even when she's on the attack, so i think even people with differing points of view would welcome the chance to spar.
and in these terribly trying time, i must highlight a tremendously overlooked asset - Rachel is fun!
What's sa matter Frank? Scared of a strong woman without makeup? She's adorable with or without it and she is the most intelligent pundit out there! Maybe you should slap on some make up of your own so you would be so transparent.
It took me a little while to warm to her, but now that I've seen her guest host a few shows for other MSNBC hosts, I think she would be a great addition to their lineup. She always seems to have actual FACTS (accurate ones, at that) to back up her opinions and uses them effectively when challenging other panelist's assertions. She's a breath of fresh air and a much needed female voice in the realm of cable political programming. Go for it, MSNBC!
Oh, and her personal life could not be MORE irrelevant. Leave it alone. She doesn't hide it (good for her)but she also doesn't use it as a talking point. I can't think of any comment she's made that seemed to have a sexual orientation agenda to it. I trust she'd be able to offer informed commentary on the subject if she so chooses, but I doubt she would unless it served to further the discussion at hand.
And, before some of you decide to attack me as a left-wing lesbian, I'm actually a moderate-conservative heterosexual living in the suburbs.
I just like to encourage quality when I see it, whatever form it comes in…
Yes, the sexual orientation issue is not relevant. But she is SUCH a bad actor. Keith Ubber-Boy and Matthews should definately be replaced by Rachel.
She's is exactly what MSNBC needs. Then their 8% of the audience will shrink to 2 percent. Maybe their sponsors will subsidize them for years to come, and we can all tune in once a year, just to be reminded how pathetic these left-wing LOONS can be.
I know lots of folks who could watch her for comedy, then go online for the real news. Ubber-boy is not as interesting as a clown. I prefer a former Rhodes Scholar. When she rails insanely it's a great reminder how sick the intelligentsia has become.
To New Reader
You remind me of the scarecrow
Compared to the constant barrage of predictable garbage spewed out by the republican spin masters and talking heads Rachael is an absolute breath of fresh air.
Unlike the talking heads on the republican self support FOX network she backs up her observations with facts. A habit not often accomplished by the FOX news people.
As for her sex orientation; well only a true conservative would be concerned with that. Personally it bothers me only because I am heterosexual and she is not.
Rachel is riveting. She strikes the perfect balance of erudition and goofiness. I know so many straight boys who are crushing on her.
To Paul, Frank Lobo, and NewReader,
It's far too late to save any of you any more. You've been brainwashed by George W., his best bud C. Rove, and the rest of the republican administration that started a war over oil, destroyed the value of the US dollar by flushing our economy into the tank and has put us so far into the red that it will take another 8 years by whoever the next president is to bring us back from the brink. So PLEASE!..FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS GOOD!… Go shoot your guns, start your wars and live in the dark ages in some other country that we'll call, um, "The Republican Union", while here, without you, we'll speed toward the future by releasing our dependence on foreign oil, promoting the civil rights of all(including race, faith, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, etc.), strengthening our health care system, creating new jobs by initiating the growth of a green infrastructure and strengthening our bonds with all foreign nations that the leader of the free world you voted for squandered to an almost pitiful ruble. Anyway, Rachael Maddow is brilliant.
Doesn't anyone remember when Rachel was a man doing drag shows on day time TV ??
this is exactly why msnbc has crappy ratings. She is so one sided and makes the the most annoying jokes. Fox news might be conservative but at least they always have both sides on to debate. It is such a turnoff to hear this lady open her mouth.
CAN'T STAND HER SHOW. GAVE IT A CHANCE AND WATCHED A FEW TIMES. IT'S BRUTAL THE WAY SHE LAUGHS BEFORE PAT BUCHANAN FINISHES SPEAKING, SO AS TO POKE FUN OR BELITTLE WHAT HE'S SAYIING. SHE COULDN'T AND CAN'T HOLD A CANDLE TO PAT. DON'T EVEN WANT TO BOTHER WITH ANYTHING ELSE.
Rachel,
Your show is informative, accurate, knowledgeable, and often humorous. I watch you on a daily bases, and sometimes twice a day. Please keep walking the walk and talking the talk. Rachel, for those haters out there tell them I said, "don't hate the messenger, hate the message". MSNBC has a jewel in you and don't let them forget it.
Rachael,I enjoy watching you on tv,you are smart,witty and act like you have more sense than the people you usually are talking to.One complaint:Have a hairstylist pull your hair toward your face,have some wispy little bangs.You are very good looking,but the hairdo needs to be softened to frame your face,the severe do is just not right for you.
When I went to school, we often had to split into groups to finish assignments. If I was in Rachel Maddow's class, I would have wanted to be on her team. She is SMART and ARTICULATE. I don't care what her sexual orientation is. When you want to win, you try to get on the team with the strongest players. If you are playing mixed doubles tennis do you care that your partner is a lesbian if her last name is King?? Duh!!
I am a conservative and I LOVE Rachael. She is smart, witty, attractive (gay, I know) and pretty fair too when it comes to right winged characters. Olberman is way too much, I cant watch him anymore and to be fair I cannot watch Sean Hannity either. He is wound way too tight and too offensive. Even on issues I agree with him about. So, good for Rachael, who cares what the other middle aged white guys ( I am middle aged and white also) think over at MSNBC. She has brought new light onto that cable channel, so there!
why can't we waterboard Mr Madoff?
he'd be happy to cooperate after that.