Holy God. Is this really happening? After about a month of asking why the New York Times won't cover the recent allegations against Jeffrey Esptein (that he ran an underage sex ring in his home and on his private jet) we finally have resolution.
The New York Times finally goes after Epstein, leaving us to no longer question their preferential treatment of the rich and powerful. We honestly thought we would never see the day when the Times reported this story, let alone the day we would see these details in the Gray Lady.
In sworn statements to the police, the 14-year-old and other teenage girls said a friend had arranged for them to visit Mr. Epstein’s home and give him massages, usually in their underwear, in exchange for cash.
Most of the girls, according to the police, said Mr. Epstein had masturbated during the massages, and a few said he had penetrated them with his fingers or penis. They identified him in photos and accurately described the inside of his home.
Even though instead of "rape" they use "intercourse" and they leave out the vibrators and girl on girl, we couldn't be more pleased that the Times finally acknowledged that a powerful guy like Epstein, who has had his hands in media, finance, and politics, has also had his hands in plenty of underage girls.
Questions of Preferential Treatment Are Raised in Sex Case Against Money Manager [Abby Goodnough]
Editorial Director
Word on the street is,that Jeffrey Epstein has no remorse and no intention of changing his proclivities. It is January and he spends alot of time importing underage talent from Eastern block nations to the Bahamas for his 2-3 per day massages. The prosecutor who offered Epstein a plea bargain of 5 years of probation for 5 felony counts is either on the take or planning to go to work for Roy Black
[...] in Florida's sex offender registry. [TSG] The biggest surprise? The New York Times, which took four hundred years to finally report on the Epstein scandal, already carries a wire report of the news. Jun 30, 2008 · Link · Respond Related [...]
[...] scandal newsworthy enough for even the most pristine of journalism outlets to cover (though that wasn't the case for the Times and Jeffrey Epstein). So with Edwards, there's no real crime here, just sweet sweet sex scandal. But that [...]