A judge has dismissed four of the seven counts in Dan Rather’s $70 million wrongful termination lawsuit against CBS. Gone are charges of fraud; remaining is the contract dispute, where Rather argues he wasn’t used appropriately in his final months as a 60 Minutes correspondent. And this wouldn’t be a Rather lawsuit if it didn’t have counsel battling over what actually happened. Says Rather’s counsel: “Justice Gammerman issued a decision today which leaves in place the entire essence of Mr. Rather’s lawsuit against CBS and Viacom, including both contract and tort claims. Although not every legal theory of the case survives, as a result of the decision, the Court has permitted discovery and a trial of all of the factual issues that form the basis of Mr. Rather’s lawsuit, including his $70 million claim for compensatory and punitive damages. The defendants’ statement that all that is left is a ‘garden variety contract dispute’ is simply inaccurate.”

Wrongful termination is one of those phrases that is often simply wrong. In fact, actual wrongful termination is extremely rare however greedy, vengeful people continually use this phrase as they seek so-called justice and revenge against their enemies. In my book, Wingtips with Spurs, Lessons From the Ranch, I title one of the chapters Firing. In it, I detail wrongful termination and what an organization must do to fortify against the turks(that is, Dan Rathers) coming over the wall.