• Perez Hilton founder Mario Lavandeira to be sued for posting topless Jennifer Aniston pics. When reached for comment, an unfazed Perez drew fake cocaine over the lawsuit and described it as "shiteous."
• Meet Dean Baquet, the "Barack Obama" of the New York Times. But will he or Jill "Hillary" Abramson take over for retiring exec editor, Bill Keller?
• Boston Globe stands by its decision to run trashy tabloid fodder about how Tom Brady dumped his preggers girlfriend.
• Weatherman Chris Knowles is leaving Fox News Channel, less than a week after hottie wife, Kiran Chetry, departed. Current outlook: Hazy, with a 60% chance of CNN.
• Jeffrey Chodorow blew $80,000 taking out a full page crazy-person rant against NYT food critic, Frank Bruni. Which is silly, really, since Chodorow could've hired a hit man for that kind of cash.
• Jurassic journalist is "too freakin' old" to deal with all the constant bitching about the Mainstream Media.
Editorial Director
WTF Jossip?! You really should post a disclaimer or some sort of warning before plastering Perez Hilton's repulsive face on your site. And Paris Hilton's stank ass in the same shot! They are the epitome of loathsome.
Perez is a putz. He has his nose in Paris' cracks and begging for attention.
I hope Jennifer nails his tiny scrotum to her front door.
Perez is a phoney wannabe. I hope he has to find work cleaning Aniston's toliets after the lawsuit.
I think that beyond the copyright infrigement, there are countless other issues involving PHilton.com which the laws deserve looking into for the good of us all:
For one, Perez still portrays himself as a simple little blogger to his readership - which is a convenient label to hide behind to slander, bully, dehumanize, and just plain destroy personalities at guise - while racking in advertising money for it.
Yet at the same time, he presents himself as a serious news organisation and credible source in the media (a business in other words), makes thousands of dollars on it, and gets free exposure in the press & TV which results in traffic for him.
But that's where it ends. Cause his enterprise blatantly refuses to take any of the responsibilities that come with the stature it is being given..and really I can't imagine any other news organisation or business which could get away with what all the slander, with the law allowing it.
Bottom line: I think Perez's site is a very dangerous enteprise, precisely because it has been misrepresented to everyone. His arrogance and hatred are besides the point close to that..