New York Predicted Angelina Jolie Would Look at Her Baby
 

We don't know if the photographer from People was inspired by the New York magazine article, or if family portraits of celebrities are just often taken on beds, but New York is struggling with their role in the highest paid cover story of tabloid times.

In between looking for an assistant for Adam Moss and dining at The Spotted Pig, New York found the time to dissect their predictions of the "Brangelina Baby" photo shoot to the real thing.

We all remember the mock cover they shot. The one showing photos of that hideous baby (we really hope it wasn't Amy Sohn's) being changed and breastfed by Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt look alikes? Well, now New York wants to play their favorite game, "we were right about something and first about something" (JT Leroy, anyone?) with the photos.

Below, compare New York's interpretation with the exclusively owned People cover that is ok for everyone but bloggers to print.

NY Mag vs. People

Notice the two major differences: NYM predicted a boy, and the new savior is actually a (spitting image of Angelina) girl. Also, NY underestimated Angelina's maternal instincts. Instead of gazing lovingly at her new daughter, she is seducing her hot ass baby daddy.

(We just hope that look leads to Brad's dream of having 10 kids coming true, thereby forcing People to pay $4 million a pop to Africa, and Shiloh saving the world.)

Better Than the Real Thing? [New York]

Comments (0)

No. 1 · jrrice

They also predicted Angelina would wear black… it's almost scary, yo.

Posted: Jun 9, 2006 at 12:38 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 2 · K

For the record NY photos looked more REAL than the actual non real coupling of Brad and Angelina. The People mag photo proves what I have said all along…she is CRAZY obsessed and desperate for him and HE only interested in the kid! Sad, Angelina put her boby thru all that to entrap him and still he does not want her just the kid or Zahara if the kid is NOT his. As for the kid, it looks nothing of Brad and instead more like Ralph Fiennes, but especially like her brother James Haven who incidentially was present at the birth like an expectant DAD too! I would put odds on James for the genes DAD if I were a betting person. Strangely, she and James have the body language of a coupling than she or her mere one and a half night stand with Brad last summer til today shows evidence of… K

Posted: Jun 9, 2006 at 1:15 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 3 · Tawny

I'm so sick of people thinking it's okay to "brag" about having an affair. She's shown over and over what a whore she is and I hope she hurries up and gets tired of Brad and burns his stupid ass so hard when she sleeps with someone else, and she will. They're both trash.

Posted: Jun 9, 2006 at 1:24 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 4 · suspicious_package

Tawny, I think I'm beginning to become obsessed with your hatred. Do you leave the same sort of messages on your husband's girlfriend's answering machine?

Posted: Jun 9, 2006 at 3:03 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 5 · Dallas

What's your problem SP? Are you ate up with jealously over another poster? We all have our opinions and you don't seem to have one but you should really get a life. Geez.
As for the Jolie/Pitt clan/group or whatever. This news is old news and if they love it so much there they should really build a hut and stay there. But I think in some of those countries you are stoned to death for adultery so they should be careful.

Posted: Jun 9, 2006 at 3:58 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 6 · AlleyKat4789

Are we sure that baby's a girl? I think I see a little something.

Posted: Jun 9, 2006 at 4:12 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 7 · Jillian

AlleyKat none of my girls looked like that so I was wondering the same thing. Kinda odd.

Posted: Jun 9, 2006 at 4:49 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 8 · anon

yeah.. i'm pretty sure that isn't even a girl in that photo….

Posted: Jun 9, 2006 at 5:28 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 9 · confused

It does look like a lil wee wee in that pic. Could she be a hermaphrodite?

Posted: Jun 11, 2006 at 2:00 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 10 · jacquelyn

Jennifer’s has got tons going for her. Looks, class, charm.
Angelina has looks, and I suppose some charm, but withot class, all you have is trailor trash with charisma, which is just the same as a good hooker.

Refuse to respect a woman that rools around with a married man, and is not WOMAN enough to stand up and say, yeah I did it.

When Angie invaded tiny tiny African coastal town to have her baby, she, in my eyes, did nothing but draw more attention to her self, the very thing she claimed to wish to avoid.

5)Along with massive bodyguards and massive bank accounts, I think she and Brad have massive egos.

Posted: Jun 13, 2006 at 1:29 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 11 · monique king

You people are all assholes. No one knows if they had an affair or what was goin on with Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston. The baby is precious and may they have good health and prosperity in raising their little daughter. U people are all haters

Posted: Jun 26, 2006 at 1:26 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 12 · Mr Skin

Putting your kid in the spotlight like that is sick and wrong. That kid will have some major problems growing up with all the media attention.

Posted: Jun 26, 2006 at 3:46 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 13 · jonny

jonny

Posted: Sep 21, 2006 at 11:44 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 14 · vaginalina jolie

Vaginalina Jolie. Ode to a dirty adultering slut! She is the quintessential yeasty-twat twit-whore. The hypocritical seeker of the sloppy Aniston seconds should invest in liposuction of those gnarly sausage lips to augment her bony arse, so her head might be better nestled while up there.

Vag Jolie…the apple does not fall far from the nasty Jon Voight. You have your father's bizarre, exaggerated facial twists and pus-bucket cheating heart.

Posted: Oct 2, 2006 at 10:24 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 15 · Janelle

lmao, that baby DOES have a little something going on!!

Angelina Jolie is a WHORE!!!! How can you call a slutty homewrecker classy?? Get a clue!

Posted: Oct 3, 2006 at 9:14 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 16 · Janelle

lmao, that baby DOES have a little something going on!!

Angelina Jolie is a WHORE!!! You dumbasses need to quit defending her. How can you call a slutty homewrecker classy?? Get a clue!!

Posted: Oct 3, 2006 at 9:15 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 17 · Janelle

lmao, that baby DOES have a little something going on!!

Angelina Jolie is a WHORE!!! You dumbasses need to quit defending her. How can you call a slutty homewrecker classy?? Get a clue!!

Posted: Oct 3, 2006 at 9:16 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
Leave a Comment

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

Already have an account? Then log in!

NEW: You can add images to your comment by clicking here and entering the URL of the picture.

 
Scroll Posts
Jossip Home | Advertise | Copyright 2009 Jossip Initiatives