Nicole Kidman Showing No Signs of Having Been Pregnant, Declares One Blind British Tabloid
Nicole Kidman recently gave birth to a baby girl. Her name is Sunday Rose, and she weighed 6 pounds 7.5 ounces. Not even two weeks since giving birth, Ms. Kidman has, according to on lookers, already lost all of her baby weight. "No sign of a baby bump," declares Britain's Daily Mail. Except, given that Kidman never looked more than five months pregnant the entire term, it's natural that she would return to a slim-ish figure quite quickly. As for that disappearing baby bump? The Daily Mail is blind.
What's that protruding through her shirt? Ah yes, the remnants of a pregnancy.

Scroll Posts

The first thing I saw in that picture was her post-baby bulge. How can they say nothing is there?
I don't think she ever carried a baby. I agree with the people who think her sister Antonio was a surrogate and the whole thing was for press.
I'm not saying it ain't NK and KU's baby, I'm saying I don't think she carried that kid and gave birth to it.
I'm a slender person, though not as tall as Nicole. In my third trimester a lot of people who didn't know me were surprised I was pregnant when I was wearing loose clothing. I only gained 16 pounds and eventually had a 6 pound 5 ounce, healthy boy. I bounced back to my pre-pregnancy weight very quickly because I began running again after the doctor's imposed three week wait. Stop beating up on Nicole!
I agree with JLD, but damn you for having those genes. This being said, though my mother has the most pear shaped body ever, she has flat abs in spite of having 4 full term pregnancies and 2 mid pregnancy miscarriages.