People To Have 'Even Less People' Working At The Magazine
 

People%20mag%20cover.jpg

Ahh, remember back when it used to take no less than five People reporters to file one story about Britney/Paris/Lindsay's latest one night stand?

Well, those days are long gone. And so are half the staff. After throngs of People people departed during Time Inc.'s involuntary mass exodus, it looks as though the head honchos are calling for even more budget cuts.

The streamlining of editorial duties continues at People, which has pruned its workforce as part of Time Inc.'s drive to cut 289 employees. The weekly has reorganized its Specials department, in charge of producing stellar newsstand performers like Sexiest Man Alive and Hottest Bachelors, so that the regular weekly staff will also produce the themed titles.

And if that's not enough, the Specials department even got booted from its luxe 29th floor space!

The Specials department used to sit on the 29th floor, but now its office will be taken up by People's Stylewatch staff. Stylewatch started as a column in the magazine but has grown to a ten-times-a-year spin-off and has its own staff helmed by editor Susan Kaufmann.

Yes, yes, who cares, but what will happen to Specials??

[Specials editor, Liz] Sporkin will continue to oversee Specials, though it is unclear if employees from the department will be dispatched to other People assignments.

Which means, once again, People's editorial staff is left cowering under their desks in ready anticipation of being unceremoniously fired.

And suddenly, it's the still-employed, overworked and underpaid freelancers who are having the last laugh.

Next on the triumphant freelancers' agenda? Health insurance.

Comments (0)

No. 1 · Neil Grieves

People sucks cock! Maybe if they put me on the cover they would sell some issues!

I'm one of the most intriguing People I know!

And my asshole has never been tighter!

VOTE FOR ME FOR GAY MAN OF THE YEAR:
http://www.genremagazine.com/G.....eman_id=86

Posted: Feb 7, 2007 at 3:52 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 2 · Fader

Um…'Even Less (sic) People Working at People?" Actually, to be grammatical about it, it should be "Fewer People…" But shitty headline writing aside, it's a sad story, since all these people are losing their jobs to prop up the stock price and maintain a double-digit return on equity, not to shore up losses.

Gotta keep those Greenwich Range Rovers rollin'…

Posted: Feb 7, 2007 at 4:32 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
Leave a Comment

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

Already have an account? Then log in!

NEW: You can add images to your comment by clicking here and entering the URL of the picture.

 
Scroll Posts
Jossip Home | Advertise | Copyright 2009 Jossip Initiatives