Sarah Palin bashed Barack Obama, which most pundits didn't expect, or advise. She also lobbed some decent punchlines at the talking head class, and for that, we appreciate her. But how did the folks who are paid to over-analyze these type of things, and who were on the receiving end of her taunts, respond to her words?
MSNBC's Keith Olbermann: "People who like this sort of thing will find this the sort of thing they like."
MSNBC's Chris Matthews: "At no time, during her entire presentation, did I think of Hillary Clinton. They have nothing in common."
Laura Ingraham, on Fox: "It’s one of the best political speeches I have heard — ever!"
Fox News "anchor" Brit Hume: "She certainly has galvanized elements of the party behind McCain within the conservative wing of the party, which had not been enthusiastic for him before."
Fox News' Chris Wallce: A "star was born tonight."
CNN's Wofl Blitzer: "Clearly, a star has been born here in the United States."
[via Politico]
Editorial Director
IS ANYONE ELSE AS SICK OF WOLF "THE BEARD" BLITZER AND CHRIS "FISH LIPS" WALLACE AS I AM? THESE PEOPLE ARE SO WORN OUT AND TIRED AND SO VERY PREDICTABLE. NOT ONLY DO WE NEED NEW BLOOD IN THE WHITE HOUSE AND POLITICS IN GENERAL, WE NEED SOME NEW BLOOD ON THE CABLE "NEWS" STATIONS. THESE PEOPLE ALL USE THE SAME LANGUAGE AND TERMINOLOGY. THEY ARE BEYOND NAUSEATING.
Woody, please take your meds. You'll appreciaite life much better.
I wish the pundits would discuss the content of her speech instead of the delivery.
Give her to Biden, then we'll see how much of her ass is left :)
Sexist filthy comments like catfeet drive decent people away from the debates. Why don't you just join Obama in saying attractive women are pigs, women have genital fish smell, and they can't have a family and work.