Leave it to Janice Min to go on live TV and report a celebrity story, only to have that story totally rejected by the celebs' reps. Remember that whole "Jennifer Aniston's engaged to Vince Vaughn" story? We thought it might be about as true as a rumor that Jen's pregnant — and it turns out that Jen's rep agrees.
Jennifer's publicist, Stephen Huvane, does not confirm the story, claiming that the coverline is "just a rumor."
"It is not true. There is no engagement."
Although they have never actually gone public with their reported relationship, the special bond that Jen and Vince have has been one of the worst-kept secrets in Hollywood.
The two got to know each other during the production of 'The Break-Up' in Chicago, and the world found out when cameras captured the couple getting quite cozy between takes on the set.
We don't who to believe: the magazine who fucks up just about every cover line or the publicist who denies every turns-out-it's true rumor about his client? Give us an answer, someone, please! How will we know what to have for dinner or how to wash our hair if all is not straight in the world of celebs?
Jen, keep ur head up and watch Brad fall on his face…
Isn't Us Weekly the magazine that trumpeted "It's a BOY!" on the cover for Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise's baby?
Brad's not falling on his face anytime soon. He is not the one who lost in this. It appears he fell out of love with her and unfortunately for her the whole world saw it happen. That would suck for anyone. Nothing against the girl but I doubt Jennifer Aniston is as innocent as she is acting. She was hooked up with Vince only a month after she and Brad announced their split. What are the odds it started just then and not before?