Scoop Wars: Star v. National Enqurier in the Case of the Lindsay Lohan Overdose

Items from Scoop Wars are brought to our attention from readers. Seen the same "exclusive" in two different tabloids? Let us know.

This edition of Scoop Wars is a little incestuous, since our two combatants – Star magazine and the National Enquirer – are both owned by American Media Inc. By why let that stop the fun?

On Dec. 4, David Perel's Enquirer ran an exclusive (pp. 40-41) on Lindsay Lohan supposedly overdosing at the Chateau Marmont (her sometimes home), where her binging required the services of a doctor to flush the goods and bring her back to health.

And in this week's issue of Bonnie Fuller's Star, guess what story we have? The one where Lindsay Lohan overdosed at the Chateu Marmont, on pp.44-45. Not only is the plotline the same (with a few new details, such as Lindsay's Grey Goose demands at the World Music Awards), but there's plenty of evidence Star staffers just copy/pasted the Enquirer's story. Recycling quotes – and merely adding an exclamation mark to the new version – has a tendency to do that.

From the Enqurier:

sw_lindsay_ne.jpg

From Star:

sw_lindsay_star.jpg

And the winner is? No brainer here, folks. Perel's team at the Enqurier had the story first, Star copy/pasted and updated, and AMI shows that its mounting debt actually might be unhealthy when it comes to funding two separate gossip operations.

Nov 30, 2006 · posted by David Hauslaib, Jossip · Link · Respond
Related Posts

  • No related posts found.
  • Comments (0)

    No. 1 Kevin says:

    I believe that those are exclamation points, not question marks.

    Posted: Nov 30, 2006 at 2:17 pm
    Leave a Comment

    It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

    Already have an account? Then log in!

    Scroll Posts