Sick of all the analysis of the New York Times article on John McCain yesterday? Sick of the analysis of that analysis? Hey, maybe we're projecting.
Either way, the New York Times will answer your questions directly today:
A recent New York Times article examined a number of decisions by Senator John McCain that raised questions about his judgment over potential conflicts of interest. The article included reporting on Mr. McCain’s relationship with a female lobbyist whose clients often had business before the Senate committee led by Mr. McCain. Since publication of the article, The Times has received over 2,000 comments, many of them criticizing the handling of the article. Editors and reporters who worked on the article will be answering questions on Friday. Please send yours to askthetimes@nytimes.com.
And if you want to look at our belly button, we'll be analyzing their answers later on.
Editorial Director
The McCain "piece" maybe be the straw that broke the NYT's back. The National Enquirer would have done better research and had more reliable sources. What the Times did was despicable and I'm not a McCain person. I hope McCain sues for slander and wins.
I'd put them in the same category as Perez Hilton.