
Remember that New Yorker cover that portraying Barack and Michelle Obama as fist-bumping terrorists and everyone was like, "Racists!!" and The New Yorker was like, "You're all hella dumb?"
Well, would real racists come out and officially support Obama with a 4,214 word editorial about why he is the best and our current government and John McCain are the worst?
"Didn't think so (please god stop calling us racists):"
It is perfectly legitimate to call attention, as McCain has done, to Obama’s lack of conventional national and international policymaking experience. We, too, wish he had more of it. But office-holding is not the only kind of experience relevant to the task of leading a wildly variegated nation. Obama’s immersion in diverse human environments (Hawaii’s racial rainbow, Chicago’s racial cauldron, countercultural New York, middle-class Kansas, predominantly Muslim Indonesia), his years of organizing among the poor, his taste of corporate law and his grounding in public-interest and constitutional law—these, too, are experiences.
See? Multicultural Obama = Multicultural nation = The New Yorker isn't racist. Now if only we could get the same admission out of Entertainment Weekly.
I fist-bumping agree with you!
Well, that should help mitigate the damage the magazine did with that terrible cover in July: http://tinyurl.com/3t8gyw
Oh give me a fucking break…..the left wing New Yorker endorses fucking Obama……where's the news????
The New Yorker endorsing Obama, would be like Pravda endorsing Putin.
Hello! chicago breast augmentation surgeon